Freedom of speech is already a controversial topic when it comes to media platforms but it is about to become a whole lot harder following a recent Facebook defamation claim.
Dylan Voller is suing three media companies over Facebook comments posted in response to stories they had published about him. The preliminary legal issue was whether, since they didn't write the comments or actively moderate them, they could be said to have “published” them. You can only be liable for defamatory material if you were intentionally involved in the act of publishing it.
In June 2019 the Supreme Court of New South Wales held that three of Australia’s largest media organisations were liable for a defamation claim brought by Voller.
Voller (23), already known to the public since the 2016 royal commission into treatment of youth detainees, brought action against the news media companies for tarnishing his reputation online by allowing users to comment on a news post on their respective pages. The comments were, as far as Voller is concerned, defamatory in nature. However, instead of going after the individuals who wrote the comments, Voller commenced proceedings against the companies who allowed the material and the comments to be posted.
Following the pre-trial hearing regarding Dylan Voller, Rothman J held that the media companies were considered primary distributors of their individual Facebook news pages and were consequentially liable for any third-party user comments posted.
Unsurprisingly, an Appeal was lodged in the full Appeal Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales a year later. Somewhat surprisingly, the Court upheld the original decision.
A consequence of the Court's decision regarding Dylan Voller is that, by being a primary distributor, the media companies could not use the defence of innocent dissemination. The news companies argued that they do not use their Facebook pages in the same way users do. Instead, they provide a platform to facilitate the discussion and dissemination of information.
The Court is yet to decide if the actual content posted and the comments were defamatory. Find additional information here.
Voller v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd; Voller v Australian News Channel Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 766.
Fairfax Media Publications; Nationwide News Pty Ltd; Australian News Channel Pty Ltd v Voller [2020] NSWCA 102.
If you would like to speak to someone about content publishing or potential defamation proceedings, you can book a free introductory consultation.
Absolutely fantastic service. Highly recommend. The team at Melbourne Law Studio was very helpful and professional keeping me updated at all stages of the process providing the best of guidance and clarity in my personal matters. Demi was outstanding in the services provided from start to finish, very helpful and insightful with prompt responses to all my queries, making the whole process far less stressful. Thank you Ines, Demi and the team for helping me move on with my life. I would highly recommend Demi and the MLS team as a whole.
Melbourne Law Studio was a beacon of hope during a very challenging time in my life. The staff was empathetic, knowledgeable, and professional. They guided me through every step of my family law matter, providing clear explanations and support. I felt reassured knowing I had a strong team advocating for my rights. I am grateful for their hard work and commitment to achieving a fair outcome.
Going through a separation was one of the toughest experiences, but Melbourne Law Studio made it feel manageable. Even though it could get emotionally overwhelming, I could see a light at the end of the tunnel. Ines was patient, listened to all my concerns, and treated me with respect and kindness. She has a really easy demeanour about her and I felt like her and the team had my back every step of the way. I can’t thank MSL enough for their support.
After my separation, a friend suggested I reach out to Ines at MLS. From the start, she was not only professional but also genuinely supportive and open about the process, costs, and the likely outcomes. Her approach was in line with my goal of reaching a fair and amicable resolution. I’m really grateful for her kindness and attention to detail. Thank you
From the first call I felt like I was in the right hands with Melbourne Law Studio. They were friendly and made me feel heard. Ines and her team went above and beyond to make sure I understood all my options and helped develop a strategy to get the best result in what was a really messy parenting dispute. Their personal approach and genuine care made me feel like I was always welcome to call them and see what was happening or what was next, the waiting sometimes for the other side was hard so I’m truly grateful for that.
Choose a time that suits you to have a chat about your legal needs.
Send us a message using the form below.
